Commercial cleaning is driven almost entirely by labor. If you improve production rates—the amount of space cleaned per hour—you reduce cost without reducing quality.

At BHS, we use a standardized operating system and a team-cleaning model that boosts efficiency by 20–40% compared to traditional “solo cleaner” methods. This is backed by industry research from ISSA, APPA, and Process Cleaning for Healthy (PCH).

Below is how we deliver lower cost and more consistent quality.

---

1. Standardization = Lower Cost + Predictable Results

Most companies rely on individual cleaning styles.
We rely on documented systems.

We standardize:

• Restroom cleaning workflow

• Floor care sequences

• Vacuuming protocols

• Equipment selection

• QC checklists

• Training modules

This ensures every cleaner follows the same sequence—reducing errors, improving speed, and keeping quality identical across all buildings.

---

2. Team Cleaning: Faster, Cleaner, and Scientifically Proven

Instead of one cleaner doing everything, we divide the shift into specialized roles:

• Vacuum Specialist

• Restroom Technician

• General Cleaner

• Disinfection Technician

This is based on ISSA’s Team Cleaning Productivity Model, which consistently shows 25–40% higher production rates than zone cleaning.

Why it works:

✔ Specialists get faster through repetition
✔ Less walking, backtracking, and equipment switching
✔ Predictable quality
✔ Easier training and onboarding
✔ Lower turnover

This efficiency is how we’re able to price competitively while maintaining margins and delivering medical-grade consistency

(Team cleaning ~35% more productive on average)

---

3. How Team Cleaning Improves Productivity and Reduces Cleaning Costs

When property managers compare commercial cleaning companies, one question matters most:
How efficiently can your team clean the building without sacrificing quality?

The truth is that in most traditional cleaning models, a large part of each shift is wasted—not because cleaners aren’t working hard, but because the system works against them. Industry research from ISSA and Process Cleaning for Healthy (PCH) shows that “zone cleaning” produces significant workflow friction.

During traditional zone cleaning, only about 60% of the hour is spent on actual cleaning work. The remaining 40% is lost in ways most people never see:

• Unnecessary walking between rooms and supply points

• Frequent equipment transitions

• Constant task switching

• Resetting areas between tasks

This inefficiency inflates labor hours and drives up your cleaning cost.

How Team Cleaning Wins Back Time (and Lowers Cost)

Team cleaning restructures the workflow so each cleaner has a specialized role —vacuuming, restrooms, trash, or detail cleaning. This method dramatically reduces wasted movement and eliminates most of the “friction time” baked into zone cleaning where the crew is divided into zones instead of roles.

As a result, productive cleaning time increases from 60% to 81%, which represents a 35% improvement in cleaning productivity.
This gain is backed by ISSA production standards and real-world data across office buildings, medical clinics, gyms, and multifamily communities.

This shift—from 60% to 81%—is the operational engine behind our ability to deliver higher quality at a lower cost.

---

4. The Customer Wins: Lower Cost, Higher Quality

By combining standardization + team cleaning + productivity data, we consistently deliver:

• Lower labor hours → Lower cost

• Specialists → Higher quality

• Repeatable workflows → Consistency across shifts

• Data-driven staffing → Accurate pricing

• Faster training → No onboarding dips

This creates a predictable, scalable cleaning system that benefits office buildings, medical facilities, schools, and gyms alike.

---

Industry Research & Citations

ISSA (International Sanitary Supply Association).
ISSA 612 Cleaning Times & Tasks, Productivity Standards. (Industry benchmark used in commercial bidding, including the NH RFP.)

APPA Leadership in Educational Facilities.
Custodial Staffing Guidelines, Levels 1–5 Production Rates.

Process Cleaning for Healthy (PCH) Institute.
Studies on team cleaning workflows and health-driven task sequencing.

Kaivac Cleaning Systems.
Team cleaning vs. zone cleaning efficiency analyses: backpack vacuuming, restroom specialization, workflow optimization.